As someone who worked in research relevant to the use of GM in agriculture, Steven explains why his views have changed. Firstly, he now believes that the importance of GM to food security has been over-stated, though it may be important in specific instances such as producing crops able to deal with changes in disease. Secondly, he is keen to move beyond the ‘inform and convince’ style discussion which I covered in a recent post (and is arguably still being used by both sides of the debate).
The European Seed Gap – AgWeb
This article makes the interesting point that we have a paradox where we only two GM seed varieties are authorized for cultivation in the EU while 46 GM products are permitted for import. For me this connects with the interesting question of accountability in the food chain. If we think a particular variety of GM is safe why don’t we let our farmers grow it? If we think it isn’t then why do we have the benefits of buying it but let other countries accept any problems which may be associated with it?
Debate on growing GM crops rife in Ghana – SPY Ghana
GM trials have been approved for Ghana, which has no commercially approved GM varieties (although the law now allows GM in the food chain). Interesting article with the kind of ridiculous image we saw in the 90s. The director of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research makes the point that if people are starving today they will take the risk of food which hasn’t had its long-term safety proven (good point – risks are all relative, but risks for environmental damage have different consequences).